The cook girl is sometimes friendly with visitors. The range of pastries is average, prices vary depending on fillings and grams, but generally affordable. You can eat an order either next to a table or take a takeaway order (in a bag, sometimes just in a napkin). In summer, an awning with tables and chairs is stretched next to the stall
Zero customer focus, deceptive advertising, rude salesman.
I wouldn't waste time on a review, but the seller was too eager to quarrel, so here it is.
There are 2 advertisements on the street "cherry vanilla ice cream + chocolate cone 2.95r". I wanted to try it. I come up, ask for cherry vanilla ice cream, the woman looks at me like I'm stupid. Sends to read the menu. Please mix. Makes a horn. It turns out not to be chocolate. I'm asking about the chocolate cone as in the advertisement. "The menu should be read." Okay. Maybe it's his own fault. Please make another one in chocolate. He says that as soon as I make it, there is melted chocolate. At this stage, I already regretted that I applied, I tried to ask again. But after vaguely explaining why this was impossible, he just said thank you and left.
I do not understand (1) why a woman is so impolite and arrogantly communicates (2) why, despite the fact that there are two advertisements with the name "cherry vanilla" hanging on the street, the request of the same name causes such difficulties. Is it so unexpected that someone asked for the product as in the advertisement next to it? Is it that unclear? (3) why the advertisement does not correspond to reality. If you have cherry vanilla ice cream + chocolate cone for 2.95, then as a consumer I have the right to just come up and ask for what is on the advertisement, for the price that is on the advertisement. And not to find out post factum that it was necessary to ask for the wrong thing and pay extra from above. There is a feeling that the dot violates the law in this regard. Oh well.
The situation is certainly not worth the nerves, so I turned a blind eye and just walked away with a horn that I didn't want and wouldn't have bought. But the negative residue remained, and it was doubly unpleasant to eat it.
I don't understand how you can work like this. Even with bad advertising, I was ready to get my horn for double the price without any questions, so as not to create a negative. But in all situations, the seller simply escalated the conflict. It feels like her goal was to fight. And the bait was an advertisement that was far from reality.
0/10 I want to erase this place from my memory, and I wish a woman to heal her nerves, learn politeness and take communication courses, and not break down on visitors