It's a poor school. I have no other word for her. The child studied there for two years and had time to understand everything from the inside. Don't believe the hypocritical posts on the school's Facebook page, it's really not like that at all.
- students. Be prepared for the fact that there will be a child in the classroom who was taken away from primary school because he was simply unable to cope, and his parents decided to send him to such a school in order to "remove" this "problem" from themselves. Or, for example, the child of someone from the administration will be in the classroom, as it was with us. In the fifth grade, he can't cope with the multiplication table, but he scolds the rest of the children.
- teachers. And it wouldn't be a big problem if teachers could find a differentiated approach depending on the child's abilities. No, yours will be stuck in place - just like those laggards. And if he shows any remaining interest in the subject, they will tell him to calm down - we will take it in the 7th grade, then you will tell him. In general, teachers are the main problem, of course. Our cool Bulgakova Irina Ivanovna is just a textbook case where a low level of education and general development, extremely poor pedagogical abilities are combined with a sense of honor and a desire to dominate the student. A teacher in the 21st year of the 21st century does not know how to use e-mail, writes with errors, does not know Russian well, does not cope with the management of the school elementary. But he tries to organize discipline at a meaningless level, demands submission, and otherwise gives unsatisfactory grades and complains (!) to parents about the child.
Would you like to discuss something with the teacher? If you ask uncomfortable questions, she will simply ignore your emails and messages. Well, or he will answer, perhaps in a week, when the relevance of the question has already disappeared.
- Distance learning has shown a lack of at least some professionalism. Teachers are trying to do the same thing offline, but via video link. They take turns reading the textbook. They answer the teacher. And your child will have to listen to what other children are saying. If he turns away or turns off the camera, God forbid, he gets two. The work should be done on paper and photos should be sent. You will not get the verified ones back, there will just be common words - passed with errors. There is no idea that an online lesson can be interesting, that you can connect a video, you can accept tasks recorded on camera or in Google forms. When you try to talk to them about it, they begin to behave aggressively and even more demanding of the child.
By the way, the school does not pay attention to coronavirus restrictions - it conducts consultations for 4-5 people at a time. For some reason, they don't care.
As a result: the Guarantor school will negate all the interest that the child may have had in knowledge. Your child will end up in an environment that promotes degradation rather than development, and teachers will do their best to promote such degradation. One teacher said that teaching physics is boring - it's a crime. I will say, to detach a child from a guarantor is a crime against a child