The square is good at any time of the year. Chestnuts bloom wonderfully in spring. The enchanting scent of lilac spreads throughout the park. On a hot summer day, it's nice to read a book in the cool shade of the trees under the rollicking singing of birds. Golden autumn is especially beautiful here. In winter, lighting creates an atmosphere. There is a monument.
Monument to the thoughtful Pan Adam. Looking at this sculpture, you realize that this is exactly what a poet should be - a little thoughtful, but genial
PUSHKIN IS OUR EVERYTHING. AND MICKIEWICZ? Is it only for the descendants of the nobility and/or those who consider themselves to be among them? Because it's somehow ungallant to think that it was our ancestors who were beaten in the stable by the noble lords for the slightest offense, for the same white (Russian) move. The hero of the monument himself is now obscenely relevant. "There is a certain G. Tovyansky in Paris who pretends to be a prophet and a miracle worker <...>. Mickiewicz believed in this charlatan, which proves that he has a passionate and enthusiastic nature, an ardent imagination and inclined to mysticism, but a weak head. Hence his teaching is called Messianism... and it is followed by several dozen people from the Poles. Once, at a lecture, Mickiewicz, in fanatical inspiration, asked his listeners if they believed in the new Messiah, some enthusiastic woman threw herself at his feet, sobbing and exclaiming: I believe, teacher!" (V.Belinsky "Answer to the Muscovite", October 1847). And the monument itself is good, and Pan Mickiewicz, as a poet, is quite thoughtful and sympathetic on it. That's just without the above explanations, we still don't understand how to count it. And what to do about it