The exposition is visually distinct, the heritage is preserved. The texts are in mov and in English. A special place is devoted to the memory of the traitor Mazepa and the military exploits of a small group of Cossacks fighting against the Orthodox Muscovites, on the side of the Muslim Turks.
The exposition as a whole is meager, there are a lot of exhibits under restoration. It is problematic to take amateur photos due to the specifics of lighting - all lighting fixtures and windows are reflected in the glass.
I was most interested in the maps, but almost all of them were drawn up according to the general plans of the Swedish General Staff and not all of them are presented.
I even got the impression that Sweden made a greater contribution to the creation of the museum than first the Russian Empire, then the USSR, and then us.
Unlike the museum, the Field of the Poltava Battle itself made an indelible impression, greatly enhanced by the conducted helicopter training flights and training parachutists.
It is a pity that the remains of the fortifications that protected Peter's command post are in a terribly deplorable state (the fault of the local population who set up a dump there).
The best place for history lessons , you can even arrange school trips from nearby cities. One bad thing is that getting by public transport is very bad, slush, mud, minibuses rarely go. We need to solve this issue somehow.