You will not find any "student" life, organization in the learning process, or desire to study in your field here. It is especially bad for payers who give money for education, and here they simply face disrespect and disregard from the staff. This is especially notable for the employee of the Department of Agricultural Economics - Vladimir Ivanovich V. In general, while Vladimir I.V. is in charge of the department, run away from there as soon as possible, because you will lose a lot of nerves, time and energy during training. Vladimir will tell you to your face that you are nobody, especially if you dare to object to something in response or ask questions about the discipline after the lecture.But providing information about the quality of educational services is the teacher's responsibility and responsibility is provided for not providing this information. Vladimir Ivanovich is unable to ensure the organization of the educational process in his classes, but he really likes to bend his fingers in front of students from the series here I know Vitoldych and have visited him many times... He can cancel pairs of tc tired, and not warn the students about it, not show up for a lecture, but send a laboratory assistant instead. He likes to take the exam and talk on the phone right in front of the student who is in charge and so trembling for the assessment. I advise applicants not to waste time and choose another educational institution to receive a V.O.
Low culture of communication with students. They don't really know how to work with people. Questions about discipline are answered rudely and incompetently.
This was especially distinguished by an employee of the Department of Agricultural Economics - Vladimir I. V.
, Always with a dissatisfied face, responds with irritation as if he was being asked not to provide a service in full, but at least to wash the floors at your house!!!!
He absolutely does not know how to work with part-time students - instead of lectures, he talked about his daughter and her low salary.
Moreover, he hinted and openly begged for gifts at the end of the course.
The management does not intend to react and take action on his behavior.
I'm talking to the management. The building on Volkovich Street, 1, where classes are held, is more than 120 years old. It is in an emergency condition. It's scary to be there, aesthetically as well. Maybe it's time to think about people? Why should those who pay for education receive knowledge in such conditions?
See original · Русский
Макс
Level 3 Local Expert
August 20
In general, everything is fine. Except for individual teachers.
I want to express the incompetence
of an employee of the Department of Economics of the agro-industrial complex. Vladimir Ivanovich.
This teacher is an example
of how you can implement your incompetence in the educational system.
His approach to teaching is chaotic and ineffective, and his attitude towards students is disgusting and completely misunderstood. A glaring defect is the bias towards grades, there is a feeling that he puts grades completely unrelated to the academic achievements of students, but, on the contrary, based on personal preferences and current mood, possibly because of the material plan.
Also
Vladimir Ivanovich
He often demonstrates complete indifference to the questions of his students. He often doesn't listen when asked for clarification and hurriedly moves on to the next topics, leaving us confused. He treats us arrogantly, presenting himself as the embodiment of justice and objectivity. If you suddenly ask for additional help or revision of grades, he invariably refuses, saying that our questions are inconvenient for him or ignoring them altogether. He also invents stories of student misconduct out of nowhere to justify his biased grades.
See original · Русский
1
Женя
Level 4 Local Expert
July 15
The worst university in the country for foreigners!
You will only waste the money you paid for training.
The quality of the teaching staff leaves much to be desired.
In this regard, learning from pseudo-teachers is boring and uninteresting. The university (or rather what is left of it) has lost its position.
Students are often forced to work on the premises.
If you do not plan to collect apples and other agricultural work, it is better to go to Minsk. Specialization leaves much to be desired. The teachers don't have time for you! There is no normal scientific work. All special courses are imposed or restricted in their choice, their list is small, scientific conferences are weak, discussions are not conducted at them, reports are made not by the smartest students, but by those who hurry to bring A4 paper to the department on time.
Университет неплохой, есть свои минусы, если и плюсы. Самые большие плюсы это, наверное, исключительные преподаватели преподающие факультету ветеринарной медицины. Выделять никого не буду прям по фамилиям, но если кто-то хочет поступать в аграрный - ветеринария один из лучших вариантов, не смотря на то что очень тяжело)
Низкая компетенция преподавательского состава, кроме того отвратно знают свое дело и терминологию. Обучают по книгам 70-х годов XX века, хотя наука в области агрономии и экономики и ветеринарии продвинулась очень далеко. И самое важное не знание истории своей страны и традиции и преподавать в университете и не иметь практической деятельности в своей области преподавания. Это ужасно! Теория, а где же ваша практическая работа ))) и с английского языка корректней переводите свои диссертации.
Не советую сюда поступать. Как оказалось универ не ценит ваш интеллект. А вот как вы умеете зубрить/играть в спортивные игры/выступать очень даже помогает в учёбе. В общем 1/5
Отличный вуз. Преподаватели нормальные, объясняют хорошо и даже заставляют учиться. Начались первые в моей жизни коллоквиумы. Уже успели даже и картошку покопаться и яблоки пособирать. С ними же и экспериментируем. 8
Для таджиков и туркменов это беларуский Гарворд
Хороший универ для аграриев, но не надо плодить бух. И экономистов для села, они все лезут в город а тут не пашут и не сеют.