I share my experience of cooperation: First, we met with the manager, who listened in detail to all our wishes and suggested several project options. The architect helped us choose the appropriate style and layout, taking into account all our wishes. We made several adjustments and approved the project. I really liked that we were actively involved in the process Then construction began. Each stage of construction was carried out according to schedule, there were no delays. We also received a report on all the work every week. We often talked with the foreman, who was always in touch and answered all our questions. I especially want to mention the quality of the materials. We were offered excellent options that matched our needs and budget. In general, we remained only in positive emotions from the cooperation, we are satisfied with the result.

See original · Русский

Galina Teslonok

Level 2 Local Expert

It seems to you that the architect has knowledge of the requirements and treats the work responsibly. After all, everything looks serious and costs money. And suddenly the location of buildings on the site is illegal, and there is no entrance to the bathroom. And this is just the beginning... it seems to you that the designer represents your interests and tries to put your desires into shape for reasonable money. Yeah, right now. He draws as it suits him, does not say or lies that it will cost mere pennies. You just sign the act of completed work. Errors were found in the first minutes after receiving the project. The manager was informed. They'll fix it now. You just need to pay extra, and it's better not to call here anymore, there's too much work.

See original · Русский

Arteom P.

Level 4 Local Expert

of the advantages: - Everything is beautiful. - Good, accommodating behavior. of the cons: - a large number of deceptions before the conclusion of the contract. The builder's calculator on the website shows the amounts divided by 3 of what is offered in the estimate. - During the design process, we received inexperienced architects and designers who directly admitted their mistakes, but did not correct them in any way and spat on the further problems of the client. - The client is given a small amount of time to check the project. - A lot of constructive issues have not been discussed with me. The builders did according to the project, which they eventually redone (doorways, roof slopes) - The project is crude, it is impossible to make an estimate for materials, everything is underestimated by 30%. Received double deliveries and downloads. - The structural components in the architectural and construction project are shown with errors in size (the size error of the monolithic beam is 340mm!), a rafter system with impossible shapes, floor beams hanging in the air. To the question, how to fix panoramic windows 5 meters high without having any foundation from above?, I was answered - "well, nail the board." - The whole chapter was missing in the project and it was impossible to approve such a project in the UKS, but since you have already signed the document that all the work has been accepted, then do it yourself. - The project was made in gross violation of fire regulations (the distance between the fence and the house is less than 3 meters) - after signing the acceptance of the project, they didn't care about you and what you couldn't do. - The reviews on Yandex were fictitious (Juliana Tutina, an employee of the PPH organization). Bottom line: Contact another place. Take care of your nerves. Reviews are being deleted, I will post it in other search engines and social networks.networks.

See original · Русский

Show business's response

Ot proekta do realizacii

Add photo or video

Products and services

Address

Contacts

Business hours

Directions

Features

Similar places nearby

18 reviews