In March 2024, I signed an agreement with this organization to install a video surveillance system at my entrance, where I live. At the conclusion, I was assured that after full payment I would get online access to the camera. It turned out that this was not the case. Although the contract specifies "storage of video data WITH THE ABILITY TO ACCESS THE ARCHIVE VIA THE INTERNET."
It turns out that this phrase has a completely different meaning. It turns out an interesting picture. Those who paid do not have access, and those who did not pay do not either.
Question: why did I have to pay for all this if I have nothing in return for it?
In short, the double meaning of the subject of the contract is misleading.
You feel cheated and a complete idiot!!!
they come on the 20th to conclude contracts, to the question from Beltelecom they say yes, because the house was previously notified that an agreement was concluded with Beltelecom for the installation of video surveillance, the contract can be terminated no later than 10 days before the beginning of next month, I remind you, they go on the 20th, that is, an attempt to dilute at least 1 payment, therefore 1 star, it would be possible to set 0 - would put 0
See original · Русский
В
Владимир Курский
Level 8 Local Expert
July 6
They offered excellent conditions, were ready to start working quickly and I liked it. Deservedly put a five - the guys really tried very hard.