I do not advise you to waste your nerves and money, with such an attitude towards customers, it is better to report a little finance and choose decent courses, rather than waste time here.
I have not encountered such a mess yet, everyone shifts responsibility to everyone, the teacher says one thing, and the administrator says another, the director says the third, and in the end they apologize and begin to meet halfway, when there is no desire to deal with this place, they begin to move and do their job only after you write a complaint or apply to the authorities.
I am currently undergoing training in Python developer skills here. The atmosphere is very pleasant, the teachers (Alexey Yunchits, Alexander Povedaiko) are generally on fire! I recommend.
Stormnet Company is once again addressing you.
I suggest you hold an open class:
1. Invite all the listeners as witnesses, 7 people who attended the lesson on May 22.
2. Invite Anastasia, a teacher of Cossacks.
3. Invite a representative of your organization.
Accordingly, to make a record of this meeting, to finally find out all the circumstances of the cancellation of the lesson.
So far, only such actions have been taken against me on your part:
1. I was removed from the testing course group, so I have no opportunity to participate in the training.
2. You do not answer phone calls, respectively, you do not answer messages either.
3. You openly accuse me of disrupting the class on May 22, maybe you have some concrete evidence, if there is, please post it here.
Taking advantage of the fact that I am not in Belarus and do not have the opportunity to come to the office and file a complaint, ignore me unilaterally.
So, I'll ask you again - can you give a reasonable answer to the fact that my grades have decreased, give an answer (justified) why the teacher unilaterally canceled the lesson that had already begun on May 22, on what basis did you exclude me from the study group?
High-level courses! Thank you for the high-quality organization of the process. I thank teacher Valeria for the excellent and structured presentation of the material.👍 For help and advice in finding a job🤗🤗
I signed up for the Java programming course (Basic level) on the recommendation. I didn't like the course. After 3-4 classes, the course began to deviate more and more from the program and rather turned into code along. The teacher writes some kind of program and explains something along the way, jumping from topic to topic. For me, it was not systematic, and often not very clear. I had to ask for homework in the chat several times. There was no feedback on them. After almost half of the course, I decided that I was not ready to waste any more time on this. Two of my classmates and I wrote a statement on the same day that we wanted to stop taking courses. The consultant called back and offered to take the course from the moment where it “stopped being clear.” I refused. I was offered to write an application for a refund of 60% of the amount from classes not attended, justifying this by the fact that I have no valid reason to refuse to attend classes. Then there is a long history of contacts with the company. As a result, I applied to the consumer protection Society, there was a court with several hearings, my claim was fully satisfied. The money was returned to two of my classmates in 100% of the non-attendance of classes. I'll have to get mine through the enforcement agencies. I do not recommend this company. There is no guarantee that you will get what is written in the program. Anyway, that's what happened to me. But if you still chose them, you did not like the courses, then keep in mind that they have no reason to return only 60% of the classes you did not attend. Feel free to contact the consumer protection Society and collect the full cost of non-attendance of classes.
1. Unqualified teachers (from the teaching side). The teacher may be cool in the field of "Software Testing", but as a teacher he is not. If you ask a teacher a question, the answer is Google. So why are you here? Probably in order to pass on your knowledge to other people? I can Google and read at home. I came to get knowledge and skills.
It's not pedagogical to get personal.
2. The teacher should give a structured lecture, not an excerpt from one lecture, then from the last lecture, and after this story they tell you well, this information is not relevant and is not needed! So why waste time?
3. WHAT WILL YOU RECEIVE AT THE END OF THE COURSE:
Employment assistance. We cooperate with more than 600 HR managers (Recruitment staff) of IT companies in the Republic of Belarus and more than 400 abroad.
This is a big lie. After completing the courses, they forget about you and don't ask if you got a job! But only promises.
4. Stuffy rooms.
5. I count the money spent for nothing!
An excellent school, I took a Software Testing course there, I had enough knowledge to start junior QA at the age of 32.
+ Intelligent teachers
+ Practice. A lot of practice
+ The test tasks took place on combat programs used by QA. They can then be specified in the resume
+ Helped to make a good resume
+ Conducted training interviews
+ Offered vacancies
+ They still keep in touch in the Skype group, there is someone to contact if you suddenly have questions
+ Skiiid was promised for the next course
I didn't find any disadvantages. Before the course, I advise you to surf the Internet and read Kulikov's book, it will be easier to learn.
In general, go boldly, it's cool there.
I signed up for Web Design (Layout) courses in HTML and CSS, JavaScript and was extremely disappointed. My patience was enough for 2 lessons, and after listening to the recording of 3 lessons, my patience finally broke and I wrote an application for a refund. The first, and most basic, is the "teacher" Konstantin, a modest young boy who has zero teaching experience. This can be seen by the way he illiterate explains the material (constantly popping up grammatical errors do not count), he shows certain ways of layout (both correct and those that do not need to be done), while constantly peeping into the computer. It feels like he is given slides to read five minutes before the lesson and he is trying to remember how to write this or that code. He is not used to working on Windows (he has a MacBook). All the training computers are on Windows, and he doesn't even remember where the program search bar is located. Well, if you know perfectly well that Windows is on computers, then come at least half an hour before the start of the lesson and remember where everything is, or at least set up Photoshop (in the second lesson it took 30 minutes to do just that). Secondly, the group can be conditionally divided into beginners and those who are already making up their own and not only. So: for those who already actively know how to do something, these courses are insofar as. While Konstantin is trying to explain something, the newcomers' brains are boiling from trying to understand what and how, and the experienced half of the group does not actually listen to him and goes about their business, editing a layout that has been made for a long time. Speaking of which. After the first lesson, Konstantin said that there would be no homework, and he would ask it after the second lesson. He dropped the topic of the second lesson and the same layout onto the disc, What was my surprise when the experienced guys already made it up and asked Konstantin to drop more layouts. What happens? While the beginners will slowly and gradually learn from the first layout, the rest of the group will make up 10, 20, 30 layouts for themselves.... Maybe it would be more competent to do so that everyone does everything the same? No? Let's move on. Due to my work schedule, I was unable to attend the third lesson and I asked to make a recording of the lesson. When it was uploaded to disk and I began to view it, I not only had to set the sound of the speakers to maximum (Konstantin's voice was barely audible anyway), but also to understand what he was trying to explain, since the recording of the lesson was obviously not conducted from the very beginning (classes last three hours, and the duration the recording was a little over 2 hours). This time the topic was about the boundaries on the page, but the code written for the example was such a wild confusion and chaos that after an hour my nerves finally gave up. Konstantin promised to start parsing the first layout in the third lesson, but judging by the recording, there was nothing like that. It's just a game. Everything is so illiterate and so nobody cares about it, as long as they pay the money. It's a shame that you pay the same as everyone else, but in fact, the courses are focused on those who already know how to do something, and not on beginners, Because not everyone can tell it in an accessible language, I'm not talking about those who, in principle, have never been a teacher. In short, I am extremely disappointed with the level of training of this teacher and this IT academy as a whole.
Contempt. This is how one word can describe the first personal contact with the management of the training center. Of course, one can explain the "neither hello nor goodbye" attitude by personal failures or bad weather. And yet a professional - he is a professional primarily in communication. Ignoring and not putting people in anything, especially strangers, there will be no great achievements. Especially when it comes to teaching. I think the management needs help in showing more respect for people, I recommend continuing your education before teaching others something.
I chose courses based on the teacher. And I am very pleased with the choice. If comfort is important to someone, then there is also nothing to find fault with.