It's kind of surreal, I have to prove the obvious things. The court does not consider scratches, traces of installation and operation to be defects. For him, a defect is the inability to perform functions, and it doesn't matter if it's working properly or not, the main thing is to perform. If the salons start selling broken and scratched cars as new, do not be surprised, everything is legal, despite the interstate GOST standards and laws.
That's who the neural network should replace in the first place, so that there is objectivity and impartiality.
The deputy chairman of the court N. ignored the provisions in the CPC RB, which describe the actions of the judge upon receipt of the appeal, about which the answer was written.
There is no abusive language in my appeal. Why do I need it?After all, the appeal itself, with its content, "blows to smithereens" the decision of the judge M. Leninsky district of Minsk.
As far as I know, professional judges take into account the different vocabulary of different people, see different ways for the parties to draw attention to their position, understand the mood of the offended party and calmly react to the above. And if they see abusive language, they simply indicate that on such and such a page there is the word "bench", which according to dictionaries is abusive and therefore should be replaced and 3 days are given for correction.
Thus, I completely disagree with the text of the response of the first Deputy chairman of the Minsk City Court N., who changed the norms of the CPC of the Republic of Belarus.
Why do judges of such high rank give answers of such content? Is this using the mechanism of the court for personal purposes?
Eureka! The Leninsky District Court of Minsk uses NON-procedural actions in court proceedings, the Minsk City Court welcomes the know-how!
What will the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus and the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Belarus say about this?
What will the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Belarus say if, in fact, the district court allowed itself to be rulemaking, ignoring the Civil Procedure Code?
as someone somewhere said: "the country is not up to the laws." I tried to sue 50% of the car bought in marriage after the divorce, they awarded 0.0% - the defendant was against it...
Clean, but poor. It's not quite as poor as in the Russian courts in the castle, it's better, but compared to the Moscow City Court or the Moscow City Court, they still remember Leonid Ilyich's peace and smoothness and walls. Belarus is not a poor country, but there is money in Mensk - Mensk deserves a new modern building for the city's palace of justice.
Why is there no response from the chairman of the Minsk City Court dated 12/18/2017on the fact of illegal actions of Deputy Grigorovich, who gave an opinion on the Definition of the October Court instead of the Moscow Court of Minsk, which prevents further appeal, leaving the application without movement.
16.01.2018 L.A.Polyakova. (The entry is made in the Book of Remarks).
A "heavy" building, either because of the architecture, or because the court...
See original
3
A
Anonymous review
August 17, 2017
Civil case (cassation) - judges Romashevskaya, Babkina, Kruk. Everything is very clear. quickly, concretely, essentially, nothing superfluous. Everything is according to the Law. Thanks to them.